Omar Moussa / 1 Dec 2025
In the energy industry, flow is everything. Power runs through grids, turbine blades slice the air, and endless reams of sensor data stream back to servers. For Omar Moussa, it’s not enough that the power flows uninterrupted; the data has to follow. And for that to happen, the chaos needs to be tamed.
“Data platforms don’t start big and beautiful,” Omar explains. “They start small—scrappy, even. A few engineers, some pipelines, ingesting sensor data or pulling operational reports. In the beginning, it’s just about making things work.”
But as he knows too well, "just making things work" doesn’t last long. Complexity scales faster than anyone can predict—metrics fracture, systems balloon, and the whole thing starts to feel like it’s on the edge of collapse. “Take energy companies,” he notes, “where data comes in from hundreds of turbines, smart meters, or IoT sensors watching the grid. It sounds manageable until errors multiply. A KPI gets calculated three different ways, and now you can’t tell which is even correct.”
The stakes in energy go well beyond inefficiency. A wrong KPI isn’t just a misstep—it’s missed revenue, over-contracting grid capacity, or an operational surprise that grids can’t afford. The moment data becomes untrustworthy, it begins to lose all value.
“Without trust, your platform is irrelevant,” Omar says simply. “If someone downstream is looking at a dashboard, and they don’t feel confident in what they’re seeing, they’ll start making decisions based on instinct rather than the data. That’s worse than having no data at all.”
Omar is obsessed with the idea of ownership. He doesn’t mean vague abstractions of responsibility; he’s talking about the nuts-and-bolts of who owns what—and what that ownership entails. Ownership is sexy in theory, but it’s messy in practice. Everyone wants to ‘own’ something until they realize what that means.
For Omar, ownership begins with expectations. When you own a piece of the system—a pipeline, a dataset, a KPI—it’s not just about saying, “That’s my problem.” It’s about the gritty details of accountability. “If you own a data product, the metadata has to be filled out. The glossary has to be completed. The data quality has to meet expectations, and if something upstream breaks, you better be the one who communicates it.”
He pauses, reflecting on an especially thorny project. “The hardest part is aligning what ownership even means. For instance, does a team own the revenue data as a whole, no matter where it comes from? Or do they only own the system that processes it? These are not small decisions. They affect every handoff in your data ecosystem.”
Ownership is sexy in theory, but it’s messy in practice. Everyone wants to ‘own’ something until they realize what that means.
In the energy sector, where teams often straddle the line between hardware (like turbines and smart grids) and software, the ownership question becomes trickier. Does the IoT team managing wind farm sensors also own the aggregated data in the warehouse? Or is that the responsibility of the predictive maintenance team? Omar sees these divisions far too often — lines blurred until nothing is clear, urgency prevailing over governance.
“That’s when data engineers get buried in ad hoc work,” he says. “Every day is a fire drill. Fix this pipeline, update that dashboard, hack something together for a crunch meeting. It’s not scalable—and it definitely doesn’t end well.”
The solution, Omar believes, lies in capability, not just delivery. “At one client, we built a system that let teams draft their own pipelines with minimal hand-holding from the data engineering team. If data maturity is the goal, you have to make it easy for teams to own, run, and maintain their stuff.”
Yet there’s no such thing as ownership without governance. It’s a word that makes people wince—bringing up images of grim checklists and endless documentation requirements. But Omar insists it’s unavoidable. “Governance isn’t compliance,” he says pointedly. “It’s what makes the whole thing work.”
He breaks it down simply: governance is knowing, at any point in time, where your data came from, how it was processed, and whether you can trust it. “Imagine you’re looking at a report about energy consumption. If you don’t know whether that number came from grid sensors, customer surveys, or a simulation model, how can you base decisions on it?”
“If your end users have to tell you there’s a problem with the data, you’ve failed,” he asserts. “You need to catch issues first. Governance is not just about compliance. It’s transparency. Every consumer of a data product should know its current health, the quality of the data, and who’s responsible.”
Omar doesn’t advocate for perfection. On the contrary, he is skeptical of many idealized models and frameworks that dominate discussions about data infrastructure. The data mesh, he notes, is a concept few organizations actually achieve. “The goal isn’t perfection,” he emphasizes, “and most organizations don’t need it.”
Take, for instance, the decision to build a data platform in the first place. Not every company requires one. “If you’ve got one or two source systems, don’t overcomplicate things,” he advises. “Set up a cron job, drop some files, and let teams work with them. Only start thinking about a platform when you’ve got multiple use cases, multiple sources, and you’re joining data every day with real business consequences.”
For Omar, the goal isn’t a perfect system. “The highest level of data maturity isn’t about some dreamy, centralized architecture,” he argues. “Sometimes the best result looks distributed—teams taking ownership in different ways, adapting to their specific needs.” Energy organizations, he notes, are riddled with inherent complexity.
The highest level of data maturity isn’t about some dreamy, centralized architecture.
“Here’s the challenge,” he says. “The IoT team doesn’t want their data flowing halfway across the company before it’s processed. They want it on-site, actionable in real time. But the analytics team downstream needs that same data—processed, cleaned, and centralized. It’s a constant negotiation.”
Omar laughs when asked about the ideal setup. “The truth is, there isn’t one,” he replies. “It’s all trade-offs. Does centralization slow you down? Does distribution create siloes? The answer always depends on the scale of your problem.”
Amid all the complexity, Omar insists that value remains the North Star. “When leadership starts questioning why they’re spending millions on a platform, what do you say?” The question is rhetorical. Omar has been in that room. He knows what that silence feels like.
His strategy? Tie data use cases directly to KPIs that leadership cares about. It’s something far too many teams overlook. “At one energy client, we mapped out their use cases. Some weren’t adding real value at all—they were just busywork. But a few were core: turbine uptime, grid efficiency, energy consumption forecasts. These are the things that mattered.”
The key, Omar believes, is in prioritization. “The energy sector doesn’t get the luxury of trial and error. If a prediction model for grid demand is unreliable, you risk both financial losses and operational instability. At that point, clarity isn’t a add-on—it’s survival.”
Underlying everything Omar says is a belief in scalability—not just of systems but of culture. As platforms mature, decisions about ownership, governance, and structure define their utility. At scale, the work becomes almost entirely about the people behind the data.
In industries as critical as energy, the stakes couldn’t be higher. “You can engineer the perfect pipeline,” he concludes, “but without the right ownership and governance, it’s a pipeline to nowhere. Scale’s the real test of any system—because once you hit it, solutions don’t matter as much as strategy.” The hum of a data infrastructure may not grab headlines like a turbine spinning at full pace, but for Omar, it’s the unnoticed lifeblood of an industry that quite literally keeps the lights on.
Omar is a Data & AI expert who has driven impact across diverse roles — from hands-on engineering and architecture to governance and AI. He specializes in helping organizations truly leverage data as a strategic asset, turning fragmented ecosystems into scalable, high-impact platforms that enable better decisions and measurable business outcomes
Omar Moussa
Next up
Blog
Change is inevitable – growth is a choice. Even if we did nothing, organisations change over time. Markets shift, technology evolves, and organisations face constant pressure to adapt. Meanwhile, people age, learn, and transform by nature. So, the question isn’t whether change will happen, but whether we invest in it to grow. And growth? That’s never easy.
Blog
In an era where almost every organisation aims to be data-driven, the path to a successful data strategy isn’t always clear-cut. True success hinges not only on implementing the right systems but also on fostering the right organisational mindset and structures. Aulona Shabani, one of our experts in data transformation, shares the secrets to a successful journey to data maturity based on her hands-on experience.
Blog
To find the real business case for MCP, we must look past the technical plumbing and examine the economic lever. Why are pragmatic engineering organizations like Block and Stripe investing here? It is not merely engineering hygiene. It is an attempt to solve two expensive enterprise problems: productivity at the edge and integration at the core.